George F. Will in his article, “Sinister figures lurk around our careless president”. Fully explains the news in his perspective about what's going on within the politicians in the White House including Donald Trump and his vice president Mike Pence. The author is able to fully explain his views on the matter by practicing strong uses of diction throughout his article. Words and phrases such as, “Mike Pence eagerly auditioned for the role as Donald Trump’s poodle. Now comfortably leashed”. And, “He did Trump’s adolescent bidding” as well as, “He deserves the degradations that he seems too sycophantic to recognize”. The emotional attachment that the author implies is quite large, in the fact that he is able to easily speak his mind in a very political and opinion based way. The author is able to show much passion in his argument by the amount of news he is able to convey in the passage. The words used and the phrases that he puts down explains his tone as being very critical and contemplative toward the president, and the vice president as well as the other political figures within the White House. Will, is also able to successfully appeal to ethos by establishing credibility within his article such as, “A man who interviewed for the position Pence captured, Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), is making amends for saying supportive things about Trump. In 2016, for example, he said he was ‘repulsed’ by people trying to transform the Republican National Convention from a merely ratifying body into a deliberative body for the purpose of preventing what has come to pass.” He is able to appeal to ethos by establishing credibility to help his claim, as well as being able to rebuttal some of the views presented in his article. The purpose of the article is to explain the instability that comes from the president and how it may be devastating to the American people, as well as the world with the political issues that come with it as a long term effect. Also, to add his input in the writing to give more than one view to the reader. For example in the article it states, “Until recently, Corker, an admirable man and talented legislator, has been, like many other people, prevented by his normality from fathoming Trump’s abnormality. Now Corker says what could have been said two years ago about Trump’s unfitness”. Which explains directly to the reader on his opinion by helping back it up on how Trump is “unfit” as to be a political leader of the United States of America. George F. Will is able to organize his argument by first explaining the information on the topic, then establishing his views by the diction he conveys, and then finally he is able to appeal to ethos by using credible sources to help back up his information he puts out. The argument he conveys is very consistent throughout the whole piece contributing to the viewpoint on how the politicians in the White House are ill-equipped due to Donald Trump, and his “poodle” Mike Pence. The speaker of this article are the Americans and other citizens viewing the leaders as a unsuitable representation of the executive branch of the United States, regarding the president and the vice president and how inadequate they are to be able to run the nation. The occasion of this article is the controversy that comes from the american people and the centrifugal force regarding the United States and the political disunity that is present. The speaker of this article are the Americans and other citizens viewing the executive branch as being “unfit”. The main subject of the piece is to inform the American people and other citizens that the White House is not able to function properly because of Trump and Pence and how crummy of a job they are doing representing the people of the United States of America.
0 Comments
10/15/2017 "TRUMP’S SLOPPY HANDLING OF HIS RUSSIA PROBLEM IS COMING BACK TO BITE HIM" Post #1Read NowAaron Blake in his article "Trump’s sloppy handling of his Russia problem is coming back to bite him". He is able to explain the news with his perspective. Words such as “Trumps norm-shattering presidency”, “it wound up contradicting itself” and “these things were more dramatic than they needed to be”. The emotional attachment the author has to his article is quite large. He is able to show much passion and argument in his wringing by the amount of news he decided to fully interpret in his passage. The words used and the statements he makes show his tone as being very caustic and disdainful towards the decisions presented by president Trump. Blake is also able to appeal to ethos explaining his credibility in the article such as, “The January FBI interview of then-National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, who assumed that post despite his lobbying work being under Justice Department investigation and despite having discussed sanctions with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.” and “Meetings between Trump and then-FBI Director James B. Comey, at which Comey says Trump pressured him to pledge loyalty”. He is able to appeal to ethos by using credible sources within the White House to help him convey the news in his perspective. The purpose of this article is to inform the reader about what is going on in the U.S and Russia’s controversy as well as to add his input in the writing to give more than one view to the reader. For example in the article it states “ Even if you believe many of their actions were in the service of covering something up — or some other purpose — several things the White House has done to draw Mueller's attention have no logical explanation, other than sloppiness.” explaining directly to the reader on how the White House was very careless on this action regarding Russia. Blake is able to organize his argument by first explaining the information on the topic, then establishing his views by the diction he conveys, and then finally he is able to appeal to ethos by using credible sources to help back up his information he puts out. The argument is consistent throughout the whole piece contributing to his viewpoints on how the Executive branch was “sloppy” in their decision leading to greater consequences. The speaker of this article are the Americans and other citizens viewing this issue as careless representation of the executive branch of the United States, emphasizing on Trump's’ sloppy mistakes in this delmia. The occasion on this passage is the back and forth conflict between the United States of America and Russia. The speaker of this article are the Americans and other citizens viewing this issue as careless representation of the executive branch of the United States,and the and the lack of information and responsibility they take for it in this quarrel. The main subject of this piece is the Russian and U.S controversy that is going on in recent times and how the U.S government is not doing their part properly as a government to help fix this issue.
|